Welcome to another insightful session where we delve into the nuances of Medit software and scanner performance, directly addressing inquiries from the Medit user group.
This Q&A episode is packed with practical solutions and expert insights aimed at overcoming common challenges encountered by our community. Following valuable feedback from our last session, we’ve chosen to explore specific topics in greater detail. This time, we present ten carefully selected questions focusing on the functionality of Medit software and comparisons of scanner performance.
With over five years of experience using Medit scanners, our dental partners are here to share their hands-on knowledge, supplemented by guidance from Medit’s technical support team. This collaboration is designed to offer a well-rounded perspective on solving prevalent software troubleshooting issues.
Question 1: Why do holes appear in the cusp of scanned data?
The issue of holes appearing in the cusp of scanned data is a frequent topic of discussion among the Medit user group. These “holes” often stem from the transparent nature of enamel, which can complicate the scanning process. The solution lies in the technique: ensuring a dry tooth surface, avoiding saliva contamination, and scanning from various angles can significantly reduce this problem. Additionally, keeping your scanner and software up to date plays a crucial role in maintaining scan quality.
Question 2: The tooth seems to have intruded into the opposing tooth by more than 1 mm. Why is this happening?
An intriguing phenomenon reported involves a tooth appearing to intrude into the opposing tooth by more than 1mm in the digital model. This can occur due to the presence of “extra data” from areas not critical to the scan, such as the buccal mucosa. A meticulous alignment process, focusing on essential data and erasing errors promptly, can mitigate this issue, ensuring accurate occlusal distance measurements.
Question 3: Is it possible to align the scanned upper model and lower jaw by using existing bite data?
The possibility of aligning scanned models using existing bite data was questioned, with the underlying assumption being that technology might offer a straightforward solution. However, the answer is not as simple as it may seem. The integration of the upper and lower jaw scans using existing bite data alone is challenging and not always feasible without additional manual adjustments and careful consideration of the data integrity and alignment principles.
Question 4: This issue concerns ‘Excessive data filtering’. Why does it occur, and which settings should I check?
“Excessive data filtering” warnings can perplex even seasoned practitioners. This usually indicates that the scanning process is capturing unnecessary data, such as soft tissues, leading to potential inaccuracies. Key adjustments include updating software regularly, ensuring scanner maintenance, and adhering to a precise scanning protocol that prioritizes teeth and relevant structures.
Question 5: Why didn’t my glove get color filtered automatically?
A common misconception explored by the Medit user group revolves around the automatic color filtering of gloves. Medit’s guidelines emphasize the importance of accurately registering glove colors to utilize the smart color filtering function effectively. Adhering to these recommendations allows users to maximize the benefits of Medit software and enhance scanning efficiency.
Navigating the challenges of digital dentistry requires not only a deep understanding of the technology but also an appreciation for the nuances of clinical application. By addressing these five common questions, practitioners can enhance their proficiency with Medit scanners, leading to improved outcomes for their patients and practices.
Stay tuned for our upcoming sessions in April, where we’ll delve into crown margin scanning, undercut analysis, and scanner performance comparison. Thank you for joining us on this journey of exploration and discovery.
