Enhancing Dental Scanning: Insights from February’s Webinar
In the dynamic field of dental technology, mastering the art of scanning, particularly for implant cases, is crucial for dental professionals aiming to elevate their practice’s precision and efficiency. February’s Medit Dental Scanning Q&A Roundup, hosted by Dr. Keun-young Jang and featuring scan specialist Chae-yeon Lee, dives deep into the common queries faced by professionals using Medit scanners. This comprehensive session not only clears up frequent questions but also provides actionable advice for optimizing scanning techniques.
Navigating the World of Scanbody
Understanding the Role of Scanbody
Scanbodies are indispensable in dental scanning, serving as the bridge between the digital world and the physical position of implant fixtures. Their correct use is pivotal for both beginners and seasoned practitioners, ensuring the accuracy of the digital impression.
Choosing the Right Scanbody
The selection process for scanbody involves a careful consideration of their composition, size, and compatibility with the implant system in use. This decision directly influences the ease of scanning and the quality of the final restoration.
Deciphering Between Abutment-level and Fixture-level Scanning
The Strategic Use of Scanbody
Choosing between direct scanning of stock abutments and the use of scanbody for custom abutments hinges on the case’s complexity. For multiple implant cases requiring custom abutments, scanbodies become essential.
Streamlining the Scanning Workflow
Adopting clear guidelines for the use of scanbody can make the scanning process more efficient, helping clinicians to decide when their use is necessary and how to apply them effectively.
Addressing Common Queries on Scanbody
This session tackled four main questions from the dental community, providing detailed responses and tips for each scenario.
-
Finding a Compatible Scanbody for Straumann Implants
One user inquired about alternatives to PEEK plastic scanbodies for Straumann implants, seeking options that offer easier verification of a precise connection. The discussion highlighted the shift from PEEK to metal scanbodies, facilitated by advancements in scanning software that allow for easy and precise scanning of metal components. This shift addresses concerns about radiolucency and compression errors associated with PEEK materials.
-
Scanning Multiple Implants with a Single Scanbody
Another question focused on how to efficiently scan multiple implant cases using a single scanbody. The answer emphasized the importance of having a diverse selection of scanbodies in terms of size and shape to handle full-mouth scans more effectively. This approach allows for greater flexibility and efficiency during the scanning process.
-
Rescanning the Scanbody Separately from the Oral Cavity
A uer struggled with integrating the scanbody data with the patient’s oral cavity scan, often resulting in the scanbody appearing isolated. The solution involves adhering to the “2+2 principle,” ensuring that at least two adjacent teeth on either side of the scanbody are accurately captured to integrate the scanbody data seamlessly with the rest of the oral scan.
-
Challenges with Tracking Multiple Scanbodies in Edentulous Cases
The final question addressed difficulties in maintaining tracking when scanning multiple scanbodies in edentulous cases. Recommendations included varying the sizes of scanbodies to help the scanner differentiate between them and utilizing the scanner’s lock function to segment the scanning process, thereby simplifying the task and enhancing accuracy.
Expert Tips for Optimal Scanning Outcomes
Metal vs. PEEK Scanbody
The preference for metal scanbody over PEEK is reinforced by their durability and ease of scanning with modern software. Tips for successful scanning include slowing down scanner movement and utilizing the gold scan function for enhanced accuracy without the need for powder.
Embracing Compatible Scanbodies
The discussion advocated for the use of compatible scanbodies, highlighting their cost-effectiveness and versatility across different implant systems. Compatible scanbodies often reflect user feedback more quickly, leading to product improvements that benefit the dental practice.
Strategic Scanbody Selection
Investing in a variety of scanbody sizes, with a focus on medium sizes for general use, ensures readiness for any clinical scenario. This strategic approach minimizes waste and ensures that the most commonly needed sizes are always on hand.
Advanced Techniques for Multiple Implants
For complex cases involving multiple implants, breaking down the scanning process into manageable steps and leveraging software features like the lock function can significantly improve efficiency and accuracy.
Conclusion: Forwarding Dental Scanning Excellence
February’s Medit Dental Scanning Q&A Roundup has shed light on practical solutions to common challenges faced in dental scanning, especially concerning implant cases. By integrating these insights and tips into their practice, dental professionals can navigate the nuances of digital scanning with greater confidence and precision, leading to enhanced patient outcomes.
As we continue to explore and share knowledge in upcoming sessions, stay engaged for more expert advice that promises to advance your dental scanning capabilities further.
👀 Discover all the insights here to enhance your scanning process
